Title: Kristen Stewart Thinks Hollywood Is Stuck in ‘Capitalist Hell’ | The Interview
Date of Upload: December 6, 2025
Platform: YouTube
Hosts: David Marchese and Lulu Garcia-Navarro
Devin Oktar Yalkin for The New York Times
I found time to listen to the The New York Times podcast "The Interview," which I consider to be an obnoxious title for a podcast that only The New York Times could think to pull off without a sense of shameless irony. It was with Kristen Stewart, an actress I have admired since Twilight, and to this day, and I say this with confidence, she was perfect. There was not, and is still not, an actress in Hollywood who could play Bella Swan to that degree of accuracy. She was perfect, and I have re-watched the series in its entirety enough times to say: there is no other.
source. Vogue, Virgile Guinard / Courtesy of Chanel
She has maintained a tasteful celebrity status, and her Chanel looks are to die for. A woman queering in the public eye is no easy thing to be, or for the liberal media to properly stomach. But in this interview she sits down with co-host David Marchese to discuss her first directorial feature, “The Chronology of Water,” an adaptation of Lidia Yuknavitch’s memoir of the same name, a movie I have not yet seen. Not a problem though, as the interview is mainly a discussion about a woman and her industry, her job, her life, her thoughts, and, as you will hear from Kristen in reference to the 8‑year wait to make this movie, it is important because "it’s about saying things."
As for the movie, she also states: "it’s like, anytime you start talking about yourself, it becomes this tired, pathetic, messy thing. And I wanted to make something tired, pathetic and messy that also felt exuberant and encouraging."
source. IMDb, Variety/Andrejs Strokins (left-right)
David is great in this interview. I enjoy this interview style; it is a break from the glut of podcasts these days that I describe as going live with your friends. Everyone is a friend in these shows and I am bored. All that tiptoeing and nothing saying and laughing and more nothing saying. Bring me an interview. Bring me risk. And David asks, "I wonder if you can make that concrete a little."
I love this little add-on in David's question. Art people talk like art people, and when talking to art people you let them talk like art people mostly because you don’t know how to make them stop, but also because you get insecure about sounding like you don’t get what you are supposed to get. And if you don’t get art, well then people start thinking you don’t get anything. Asking a celebrity to make the poetic formal is a bold move for an interviewer, something I wish more interviews with creatives had. Kristen's explanation afterwards is rewarding though. She gets art properly, and understands her work and creation with the sense of a journeyman.
At 6:27 she says, "I’m a morning person." Later she appends this brilliant line about her movie: "there’s a sexuality in it that feels delicious."
Within the compulsory inclusion of "what is it like to be a celebrity and witness how everyone talks about you,” some great nuggets emerge. I will sincerely, lol, always want to make that Love Island joke.
Kristen: "I don’t fixate on how things are going to land on other people, because I’m not smart enough." A case for failing in public then? How terrifying.
David: At some point, you became a character in the tabloids, and I was curious about what you learned from seeing this character, Kristen Stewart, out in the world, and you know it’s not you.
Kristen: But sometimes it is.
Oh God, this has to be one of my favourite responses to this question type I have ever heard. Finally we are being honest. Yes, celebrity personas are thin accounts of their human experience, but there has to be at some point a little of themselves there. The speculation as to how much is useless, but the acknowledgement of the reality that they got you right, they get you right sometimes, and I wonder what that feels like for them. Even with the people I meet, they are here today and gone tomorrow, and most of that is the biological makeup of my brain, but my memory can’t be all wrong. And in the moments when the ephemeral is no longer and we catch a glimpse of that static invention of who we are, that is exhilarating. So yes, "sometimes it is."
David: I said that like I know you. I don’t know you. Maybe it was you.
Kristen: You do know me now, and that belongs to you.
Now it does. It is the place we share together; now you know this me. In my understanding, which is limited to less than 3 decades, the cross-linking of information or person-hood and personality ownership is prosaic and meaningless. They get what they want, and what they believe and think is just as much their right to own as the version of yourself you continue to mutate. With you I am me, and through you I become me.
source. Reddit r/whatthefrock
Some more great quotes:
- 1.
Kristen:"I don’t want to not get invited to the party, but then you go to the party and you’re like, this party sucks."
- 2.
Kristen: "Having it be so impossible for people to tell stories is capitalist hell, and it hates women and marginalized voices, and it’s racist."
- 3.
Kristen: "You plateau into contentment after a lot of false victories and false starts, and then you achieve something that feels self-earned, even if accompanied."
This is a podcast in The Cyber Harvest 0.01. Check out the page on my site, Plush Diagnosis.
To all the angels,
Plush 💋